Mexico requests USMCA review of antidumping quotas on steel
The Economy Ministry (SE) requested a review of antidumping quotas on steel exports to the United States under the framework of the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA).
The SE published the request for a review in the government’s official gazette (DOF) on Monday. The ministry asked a binational panel under the terms of the trade pact to assess the U.S. Department of Commerce (DOC)’s antidumping quotas on U.S. imports of steel concrete reinforcing bars (rebar) from Mexico.
Mexico’s request concerns a DOC investigation carried out between 2020 and 2021 and published on June 9 that determined that a handful of companies — Deacero, Grupo Acerero, ArcelorMittal México, Grupo Simec and Sidertul — held dumping margins of between 2.3 and 16.28%.
Investigations of this type are carried out when an importing country feels it is being negatively impacted by unfair practices, including dumping, which is when one country exports products at a far lower price than in the home market.
In February, a group of 14 U.S. Senators urged the Biden administration to take action against a “surge” of Mexican steel imports, arguing that Mexico was violating a 2019 agreement in which both countries agreed to monitor the trade balance of steel and aluminum. United States steel companies argued that an influx in Mexican steel and aluminum was negatively impacting the domestic industry. They also called for measures to prevent unfairly subsidized (or dumped) prices.
According to the SE’s publication in the DOF, the USMCA allows a country that is impacted by antidumping quotas to request that a binational panel review the imposed measures no later than 30 days after the filing of the first request for a panel review.
The USMCA stipulates that “the panel review will be limited to the allegations of error of fact or law, including challenges to the jurisdiction of the investigating authority, that are set out in the Complaints filed in the panel review and to the procedural and substantive defenses raised in the panel review.”
If the panel review finds non-conformities in steel exports to the U.S., both parties must seek a solution within 90 days of the panel’s conclusion.
With reports from Milenio and El Economista
Have something to say? If you’d like to share your opinion or perspective on what you’ve just read, please consider sending a letter to the editor by visiting this page. Or if you’d prefer to engage with our community of readers, check out our social media pages on Facebook, Twitter, Instagram or LinkedIn. We look forward to hearing from you!
Source: Mexico News Daily